Trusting Trusts

One of the most misunderstood words in the legal profession is trust. I am talking about a trust, the legal document. Many people can describe to me what a trust does ("it avoids taxes", "it keeps things secret", "it allows me to tell my son what to do with my money", "it manages my money", etc.) Few people actually see the essence of what a trust is, and what it is not.

Black's Law Dictionary defines a trust as "a right of property, real or personal, held by one party for the benefit of another." Or, "an obligation arising out of a confidence reposed in the trustee or representative, who has the legal title to property conveyed to him, that he will faithfully apply the property according to the confidence reposed, or, in other words, according to the wishes of the grantor of the trust." Well, that's a lot of help. I like to think of trusts as nothing more than "instructions". The person making the trust instructs the trustee to do something for the benefit of another person (the beneficiary). Try the exercise of replacing the word 'trust' with the word 'instructions' and I think you'll see how simple it can translate legal jargon. Trusts are really the modern equivalent of wills a generation ago. They are affordable, flexible, can avoid probate, reduce will contests and protect your family from a myriad of legal problems. Some types of trusts can even help you qualify for Medicaid as part of a comprehensive Massachusetts elder law plan.

Although trusts come in many different flavors and styles, the core element is protection of assets and ease of management. Some countries, most notably France, have no legal identity for trusts. Even the term 'trust' can't be easily translated into French, because there is no legal equivalent. As a result it can be very difficult for trusts to acquire property in France or otherwise conduct business as they are not recognized as separate legal entities. Although the concept of a trust may exist in other countries as a practical matter trusts are only used by the super rich and powerful. During the middle of the 20th century, as U.S. banks and trust companies became more competitive to offer services to a burgeoning (upper) middle class that came about after World War II, trusts became more available. In sum, a good written set of instructions left in the hands of a good person is your best defense against an unwanted outcome upon your incapacity or death. Trusts fit the bill. Let one of Law for Life's experienced trust and estate planning attorneys help you with your personal trust planning. Call them at Gosselin Law at 781-729-0313.

Estate Planning - Is Your Trustee Trustworthy?

How did wealthy Aunt Sally's bequest of $500,000 a year to help stray cats end up going to The Foundation for the Preservation of Home Brewers after she was gone? She had both a will and a trust explicitly spelling out her wishes that were supposed to be followed in perpetuity.

Stewardship is a lost art. As an estate planning attorney I am charged with preserving my clients' intents through various documents, such as wills, trusts and charitable foundations. I guide clients on selecting experienced, competent and reliable fiduciaries. I follow through to know that my clients' estate planning trusts are funded before death to avoid unnecessary probate administration.

A recent New York Times piece reminds me how important it is for me, an estate planning attorney, to see that my clients' wishes are preserved, not perverted by the corporate greed that pervades the corporate estate and trust administration industry.

The Times article shows how many irrevocable trusts, charitable trusts and private foundations are administered by stingy corporate trust giants more interested in collecting fees than serving the wishes of those no longer here. Why give the money to charities? It will only reduce trust fees.

But that is not even the worst part. According to the Times, the wishes of clients are often changed to reflect the wishes of the administrators. The charities specified in the trusts are replaced by charities chosen by administrators as more appropriate. Generous gifts become less so, or even disappear. Why?

Why indeed. The trust industry in the United States got its big start in Boston over 200 years ago with the First National Bank of Boston in 1784. The bank was chartered to serve the banking needs of ship captains, mainly whalers and Far East Traders.

Often the ships would be gone for over a year at a time while the captains' families stayed behind in Massachusetts. As a result, Boston trust lawyers and trust companies were charged with preserving and protecting the wealth of the merchant fleet. Massachusetts developed a great body of trust law, that to this day is unrivaled in any other state.

Silent among those laws is a clear definition as to what a reasonable action would be by a trustee. Certainly the trustees must act reasonably. But because most estate planning attorneys draft trusts with the broadest of fiduciary powers, theses same discretionary powers are often the tool of self serving corporate trustees. The cure? For one, clear language is a good start. I am a strong advocate among the Massachusetts Bar for clear language in all estate planning documents.

Our law firm is partial to English, as opposed to legaldygook, for all our estate planning documents. If you cannot understand the plain meaning of a document after carefully reading it once, it is not clearly written. Secondly, we are proponents of using co-trustees or trust protectors on all trusts and foundations. In this way, there are checks against outrageous unrestrained abuse of power by trustees as outlined in the Times article.

Last, and most important, we provide for removal of the trustee in all of our trust planning, should that trustee fail to perform fiduciary duties. Provisions are made that such a trustee can be replaced by one willing and able to do the job consistent with the language of the trust and the wishes of the client.