Getting to Sure: Legal Capacity and the Elder Lawyer in the Context of Reverse Mortgage Transactions
Introduction: Legal Capacity and the Elderly
In general, the law presumes that all adults have legal capacity unless proven otherwise. The legal standard of proof is “clear and convincing” which means, in essence, that the law sets the bar pretty high for those wanting to prove that someone is incapable of being a legal person and, therefore, unable to be a client or enter into contractual arrangements. That being said, legal capacity is situational, as is the required degree of mental capacity, both depend on the proposed act. For example, a relatively low level of capacity is required for someone to create a valid will (individuals making a will only need to show that they understand that the document they are creating is a will), while a higher level of capacity is needed for providing informed consent to medical care. The degree of legal capacity necessary to establish a lawyer-client relationship lies somewhere between the capacity of a will-maker and that needed to give informed consent to medical care. In order for prospective clients to ethically be considered legal clients, lawyers must be able to establish that the clients have sufficient legal capacity to both become the lawyer’s client, as well as having the legal capacity to take whatever legal action the client purports to do.
Medical Tests and Legal Ethics: What’s the Standard Measure of Capacity?
When dealing with elderly clients, the law’s general presumption of the client’s capacity may be inaccurate in many situations involving elderly clients. When family members (e.g. adult children), brings an aged person to an elder law attorney, in some instances they may be doing so because of some observed events or behaviors that suggest to them that the person’s mental faculties are declining. Such non-clinical observations while not determinative, they do raise the question of whether the person in question has the legal capacity. How then does an elder law attorney determine a prospective client’s legal capacity?
According to Veda Johnson, who has been a geriatric nurse for ten years working in nursing homes and hospitals in Orlando, Florida, where the elderly population has been growing rapidly for the last ten to fifteen years, assessing the mental acuity of an elderly patient is not simple. There are several kinds of tools in the form of scales or assessments, like the Glasgow Coma Scale for example, that are used to evaluate how “alert and oriented” an elderly person might be. Unlike nurses, lawyers seeking to determine whether elderly clients have sufficient legal capacity do not have any professional tools available to them. There is no standardized procedure or even a universally accepted legal definition. And in both the medical arena and the legal field determining if a person is losing her mental faculties is never a yes-or-no question.
Each lawyer must make an independent, holistic determination on a case-by-case basis, each time weighing all the facts and circumstances. Some attorneys rely on their personal observation of the older person plus comments from those who spend time with the older individual. But, determining if one has legal capacity is not the same as rationally determining what makes sense to the according to attorneys’ predilections. So attorneys must be aware of keeping their own prejudices at bay when making a determination. While bizarre or inexplicable behavior can be interpreted as evidence of diminished capacity, eccentricity is not the same as incapacity. But, as one might imagine, the dividing line can be exceedingly difficult to draw.
The Model Rules governing lawyers’ ethics nationwide are primarily aspirational, but should at least guide lawyers’ decisions about where the line falls. States may also have ethic rules on what constitutes legal capacity in the context of representing elderly clients. In Massachusetts, for example, Rule 1.14 of the Massachusetts Rules of Professional Conduct lays out what lawyers must do if they suspect that a prospective client lacks legal capacity. The rule does not specifically speak to elder attorneys; however, Comment 1 to the rule states in part, “it is recognized that some persons of advanced age can be quite capable of handling routine financial matters while needing special legal protection concerning major transactions.” Entering into a reverse mortgage transaction is more complex than contracting for other secured loans (like home equity loans, for example) so a reverse mortgage can be considered a “major transaction.” There will be times when a lawyer will conclude that a client seeking to obtain legal representation in procuring a reverse mortgage loan lacks legal capacity, but has legal capacity for other contractual matters. If this is the case, there are a few options for lawyers that allow them to represent an elderly client.
Powers of Attorney
One option is obtaining a power of attorney. There are three kinds of power of attorneys. There is the non-durable power of attorney which terminates when the person who created it becomes legally incapacitated. A durable power of attorney, on the other hand, continues to be valid even after the principal becomes incapacitated. The third kind of a power of attorney is the springing power of attorney which becomes effective only upon the happening of an event that has been designated in the terms of the document. All powers of attorney terminate automatically upon death.
It is better for seniors to create power of attorneys when they are legally competent and in good health. But, if there are already health problems, early signs of dementia or Alzheimer’s disease, one should be created immediately. By creating a durable power of attorney for finances, with gifting authority, for example, seniors can appoint someone else to handle their personal finances, including the authority to transfer your assets even after they become incapacitated.
Guardianships
Guardianships are a more formal option than powers of attorney. They involve going through a legal process in the probate courts. There are generally three types of guardianships. First, guardianship of the estate, or as it is also known, conservatorship, which is limited to substitute decision making for matters concerning the incapacitated person’s property (assets). Second, guardianship over the person, which gives the guardian control over decisions affecting the “person’s person”, such as: where to live or whether to consent to medical treatment. Third, plenary guardianship, which grants guardians the power to make decisions over both the person’s property and person. Within the context of these three forms of guardianships, most state statutes permit probate courts to appoint limited guardians; which means, as the name implies, that such guardians have no more power than is necessary to meet the needs of the persons over whom they are appointed.
Joint Ownership Arrangements
Powers of attorney and guardianships are not the only ways of making sure that an older person will have a mechanism in place for taking care of financial affairs when that person is no longer able to do so. Joint ownership arrangements can also be used. The specific forms include joint tenancy, tenancy in common and, for married couples, tenancy by the entirety. The types of joint ownership arrangements have many characteristics in common. One such feature is what happens when one joint owner dies - the other owner automatically assumes ownership and control of what was owned in common. Creating a joint tenancy can be quite simple. Adding a new signature on a bank account or changing a deed on real estate may be sufficient; no special forms are needed. But, creating a joint tenancy can have complex financial, tax and legal consequences, thus, it is probably advisable to consult a lawyer or financial professional for advice before creating one.
Revocable Trusts
Another alternative to guardianship is creating a revocable trust to hold the older person’s (a.k.a. settlor’s or grantor’s or trustor’s) assets. The trustee of the trust might be a close friend or relative or perhaps a bank’s trust department or some other financial institution. The trust may be structured with the settlor as the sole trustee or in conjunction with another trustee who will take over completely if the settlor is no longer willing or able to handle financial matters. By definition, a revocable trust can be modified as long as the settlor is legally capable of making that decision. If the settlor becomes legally incapacitated, and there’s no alternate settlor, then the trust becomes irrevocable and only terminates upon the settlor’s death.
Reverse Mortgage Transactions and Legal Capacity
Like lawyers, lenders serving seniors 62 or older who do not have the legal capacity to enter into a reverse mortgage transaction can do so with the person or entity appointed in a durable power of attorney or with a court order guardian. Under the federal home mortgage program, HECM and HUD, guardians and attorneys-in-fact or agents named in durable powers of attorney (together referred to as legal representatives) may execute the legal documents incident to a reverse mortgage transaction, provided that they have the authority to do so by court order or per the terms of the power of attorney contract. Part of any reverse mortgage transaction also involves counseling. The law requires that seniors receive counseling before they obtain a loan. Legal representatives can and must request counseling. Whether counseling sessions are between, counselors and legal representatives or counselors and seniors directly, the reverse mortgage counseling code of ethics requires that all counseling sessions, by HUD-approved HECM counseling agencies be confidential in any event.
Reverse mortgages depend on borrower eligibility and living arrangement so it may be harder for a trust or joint owner of a property to become a borrower in a reverse mortgage loan. The trust, for example, would have to be structured in a way that left the 62-year-old prospective borrower/settlor as owner of the property to be mortgaged and the home must also be the settlor’s primary residence. As far as joint ownership, both owners would have to be reverse mortgage eligible. Thus, using revocable trusts or joint ownership as mechanisms to protect seniors at risk of losing legal capacity has some drawbacks. An elder lawyer and financial professional can help seniors and their families decide what options are best for them.
Getting to Sure in an Unsure World: A Charge for Elder Lawyers
Representing elderly clients involve many unique issues for legal and financial professionals. Assessing legal capacity is one of those issues. Many elder attorneys have developed intake forms that include questions which are useful in assessing the legal capacity of prospective clients (as well as run-of-the-mill questions about finances and ownership.) Asking what seems like simple questions like “What day is it today?” as well as questions about medications can be good when trying to decide: (a) does this person have the required legal capacity become a client; and (b) can this person enter into a major transaction like a reverse mortgage? At the end of the day the answers provided may merely help lawyers become more sure (or less certain) about the prospective client’s legal capacity, but at least lawyers would be doing their part in “getting to sure” about that client’s mental capacity as a legal matter.
Gosselin Law provides comprehensive elder law, estate planning and reverse mortgage services. These services include Medicaid applications; emergency elder law matters; real estate transactions; guardianship; estate tax matters; wills; trusts; Medicaid annuities; Annuity planning for Medicaid; Medicaid trusts; special needs planning and related areas. Gosselin Law can be reached at 781-729-0313 or toll free 877-325-6746. Serving Massachusetts and New Hampshire.
