Reverse Mortgage - What You Need to Know from A Massachusetts Elder Law Attorney

Reverse Mortgage: Gimmick or Good Deal?

Today, several of the new skin products being marketed tout that they can reverse the signs of aging. They make claims that they can remove wrinkles or increase energy or improve memory. I don't know if any of these products can deliver on their claims. But for seniors 62-years-old or older who own (or almost own) the home they live in, there is a way to reverse one thing in their lives, the mortgage on their homes.

How? In a typical mortgage, a home owner pays the bank a monthly amortized amount. In a reverse mortgage, a home owner pays the bank a monthly amortized amount. Does this sound too good to be true? Is this another anti-aging product gimmick? It's not. For many seniors, a reverse mortgage is a sound financial planning tool, and according to Brett Kirkpatrick of Mortgage Financial Services , "A reverse mortgage might be the ideal option for seniors to maintain their financial independence."

Some Reverse Mortgage History

Reverse mortgages have been available in the United States since 1961 but with considerable variation from one region of the country to another. In 1991 the Federal government expanded its insurance of reverse mortgages, thereby increasing availability across the map. With the rising cost of healthcare, unanticipated increases in inflation, pension plans going under and the unpredictable nature of Social Security, more seniors are looking towards their houses for the cash they need.

In fact, as property values have risen, a number of seniors who took out reverse mortgage loans years ago are returning for second and even third reverse mortgages to harvest the additional equity that has built up in their homes. "Most senior homeowners just want to remain comfortable in their own home." states Ed Barrett, a reverse mortgage expert from Your Home for Life in Westwood, Mass. "With the rising costs of everything today, that is becoming harder and harder to do. Now, with the federally insured reverse mortgage, there is a new option available that really provides for financial security and peace of mind. It really can be 'Your Home For Life'." According to the Federal Housing Administration, which insures most reverse mortgages, by September of 2005, homeowners had taken out about 43,000 reverse mortgages, up from about 37,800 the year before and from 7,700 in 2001. The demand continues to rise with 56% more loans taken out in the first quarter of 2006 than in 2005.

The Ins & Outs of Reverse Mortgages

To qualify for a reverse mortgage, at least one person on the home's title must be 62 years old, the home must be the owner's primary residence (i.e., the homeowner must actually live in the home) and the home must be owned outright or the reverse mortgage loan must be used to pay off the outstanding mortgage balance.

The Federal reverse mortgage loan program has a cap on the size of the mortgage loan it provides, so for those seeking amounts in excess of the Federal limits, state programs and private lenders are a better choice. For both Federal and state programs, there may be restrictions on the types of residences that qualify. For example, under the Federal program condos are eligible, but shareholder-owned cooperatives are not. In Massachusetts, SFR, MFR (1-4 units), Condo's, and HUD-approved manufactured housing are all eligible. Loans generally are written for no more than one-half to two-thirds the value of a home and even if the value of the home changes while the loan is outstanding, the borrower only owes the amount of the loan. The repayment amount can never exceed the value of the home. In fact, under the Federal program, the government makes up the deficiency, if any, to the lending institution, and while Private Placement programs are not insured, all are "non-recourse".

The borrower decides how to receive the loan money. There are four payment options: (1) an up-front lump sum payment; (2) a line of credit; (3) fixed monthly payments; and (4) a combination of a line of credit and fixed monthly payments. With any of these options there are fees and costs, but many of these are the same fees and costs that would be incurred with any loan. For example, there is an origination fee, an up-front mortgage insurance fee, an appraisal fee, and standard closing costs. As far as Uncle Sam is concerned, the money received from a reverse mortgage is not taxable as income, regardless of the way the money is paid. Likewise, many states do not consider reverse mortgages as income. They are not count ed as disqualifying resources for most Federal and state public assistance programs.

A reverse mortgage must be carefully evaluated as it is more complex than other secured loans (like home equity loans, for example). It is suggested that seniors considering one seek the advice of a legal, tax or financial advisor. In fact, the law requires that seniors receive counseling before they obtain a loan. Typically, such counseling covers budgeting and general financial planning, as well as the tax implications and Medicaid/public assistance ramifications. The AARP, Fannie Mae and HUD are three agencies that provide counselor referrals. As previously mentioned, reverse mortgage loans contain fees and costs. However, the fees and costs are low and are not paid out of pocket or up front. They are added to the total loan amount along with the interest, and are paid when the loan's term expires. If a borrower's reverse mortgage is structured as monthly payments "for life", his or her estate may end up paying off the loan.

The Federal reverse mortgage program assumes a life expectancy of 100 years, thus, monthly payments may be lower for seniors closer to age 62 than for those nearer to 100. The life expectancy assumed by Massachusetts, as well as for all other programs is 100 years. One thing about reverse mortgages that seems to worry most seniors is that having a reverse mortgage loan will prevent their children and grandchildren from inheriting their home.

Seniors who want to ensure that their heirs are provided for could take advantage of the new transfer rules under the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005 (passed in 2006) which allows, among other things, transfers made five years before their application for Medicaid to be outside the "look-back period". Being outside the "look-back period" means that the seniors will not be penalized for the transfer. For example, if a senior gives some of her savings and investments to her grandchildren five years before she needs Medicaid, she qualify immediately, provided of course, that she is careful not to make it seem like the transfer was made for the sole purpose of qualifying. Even if seniors do not take advantage of the new transfer rules, the rising costs of real estate should protect the home for their heirs, who can sell the house and use the proceeds to pay off the reverse mortgage note and keep the profit. In fact under the Deficit Reduction Act, seniors with more mortgage on their home may fair better (in some circumstances) that those who have higher equity.

The new law's limit of $500,000 on home equity (which can be increased up to $750,000 at state option) may well mean that seniors owning homes with greater equity could risk not qualifying for Medicaid coverage. If the equity is tapped using a reverse mortgage loan,  seniors may be sheltered from disqualification.

Because You Were Curious: Other Home Equity Conversion Mechanisms The desire of seniors to utilize the value of their homes' equity, while continuing to live in their homes has led to banks offering various other home equity conversion mechanisms in addition to reverse mortgages. Home equity loans, sale-leasebacks and financial arrangements in which seniors retain a life interest in the home while selling the remainder interest are other options for seniors to harness the equity in their homes. However, none of these are as beneficial to seniors or are as easy to obtain as a reverse mortgage.

For example, most home equity loans require that the borrower demonstrate a dependable source of income that can support monthly re-payment obligations. As a result, most seniors in retirement are not likely to have the income that is necessary to obtain a home equity loan. In a sale-leaseback (where the home is sold and then simultaneously leased back to the person for life) or a sale of a remainder interest transaction (where the homeowner retains a life estate in the home while selling the remainder interest) a major concern, in each of these transactions, is that it may be difficult to find a suitable buyer who is willing to buy the home subject to the sort of leasehold restrictions that an older homeowner requires. In sale-leaseback and remainder interest transactions, there are also tax and public assistance issues that may not make these viable options for seniors.

Reverse Mortgage in Summary

A reverse mortgage is a financial planning tool that is increasingly being used by senior homeowners from all walks of life. They are an attractive option that allows seniors across the economic spectrum to have more cash by increasing the liquidity of an asset that most do not think of as liquid, a home. According to Ed Barrett of Your Home For Life, "Reverses offer a better quality of life for those who need more cash flow than offered by a pension or social security benefits and enable much needed repairs to your home to be made, all without making a single monthly payment," and while reverse mortgages can't remove wrinkles, increase energy or improve memory, they do help seniors lead a richer and more rewarding life.

Mortgage Originator Licensing in Massachusetts

In the past several weeks I have met with several mortgage loan originators to discuss the next thing in the mortgage industry - mortgage financial planning. Whether born of the mortgage market meltdown, the rise of reverse mortgages or simply all the free time that mortgage loan originators are finding themselves with, there is a new phenomenon of the lowly mortgage salesperson becoming a quasi professional giving potential borrowers all sorts of advice about mortgage loan products.

There are weekend seminars that give you "certification", online courses to become a "diplomate" (I did not make that one up), and any number of in-house training programs. In an ever consolidating industry so narrowly focused on mortgage rates, The goal is for mortgage originators to distinguish themselves on the basis of service and added value.

Being a specialist or planner means using the mortgage as an integrated component of the financial plan rather than just a mere loan. Timing payments, tracking benchmark rates, coordinating debt with equity investments, putting estate and tax planning in the big picture and elevating the message that a mortgage is as important a financial services product as life insurance, mutual funds and bonds.

When I refer clients for mortgage services I only look for those loan orginators that are the real pros - like most businesses there are far too many "posers" that merely take orders and smile. You can find links on the Law for Life blog to some of the lenders that we work with regularly and know that they can deliver what they promise.

Kevin Clark from Clark Mortgage Consulting (he's part of the PHH Mortgage empire) is one those originators that "gets it" when it comes to mortgage planning. Kevin has obtained the CMPS (Certified Mortgage Planning Specialist) designation which seems to be the most complete review and training for full service mortgage originators (www.cmpsinstitute.org). Kevin is a thorough and competent professional that fits the right product to each borrower.

Likewise, in the reverse mortgage world, Ed Barrett of Your Home for Life (www.yourhomeforlife.com) is the best reverse mortgage originator in Massachusetts. He is active in the National Reverse Mortgage Lenders Association's (www.nrmla.org) professional development efforts and puts more effort than anyone into perfecting his knowledge of reverse mortgages.

So, all this talk of professional accreditation and education makes the 800lb gorrilla in the corner speak up a little. What 800lb gorrilla? Licensing, of course. Currently Massachusetts licenses mortgage lenders and brokers as sort of "junior banks" with a fair amount of oversight and restrictions, but there are no licenses for individual loan originators. None. Zilch. Nada. Want to be a loan originator? All you need is a friend in the business with a license and 3 days to wait for VistaPrint to send your box of cards.

Like any maturing industry mortgage origination in Massachusetts has come to its time of reckoning. Frankly, with loan originators leaving the industry in droves because of low mortgage loan volumes, those mortgage originators staying in the business are the "survivors" and really those that should embrace licensing as a way to protect their stock in trade. Licensing leads to regulatory oversight, continuing education and professional recognition for mortgage originators.

On the con side, the Commonwealth of Massachusetts has done a poor job overseeing real estate salespersons and real estate brokers in Massachusetts. It is quite difficult for a consumer to get heard in their complaint and few real estate agents are subjected to any meaningful discipline in any given year. You can read more about my position on this issue in my Boston Magazine interview from a few years back here: http://www.bostonmagazine.com/home/articles/double_agents/

I favor mortgage originator licensing in Massachusetts if it is acheived by communication with industry leaders, a committment to oversight by regulators and includes both a strong consumer participation process and mandatory continuing education (including business ethics for mortgage originators).