Boston Estate Planning and Probate Lawyer & Attorney : Gosselin & Associates Law Firm : Serving Boston, Winchester, Hingham, Wellesley, Manchester

I admire Roto Rooter. Few other businesses are so financially successful using a single tool - such as the spiraling drain cleaning tool. As an elder law and Medicaid attorney in Massachusetts I am starting to feel like Roto Rooter. New Medicaid regulations and qualifications have made it nearly impossible at the time of nursing home admission to protect an elder's assets. Despite the strict guidelines and pre-planning requirements of the Deficit Reduction Act and interim state and federal regulation, we are still winning the battle of family asset protection.

 Of course, our one tool in Massachusetts is the Medicaid Qualifying Immediate Annuity, also called Single Premium Immediate Annuity (or SPIA). These annuities are quite simple, the Medicaid applicant or their community spouse contributes a lump of funds to an annuity account with an insurance company and the insurance company returns the money to the annuitant over a fixed period of time consistent with their life expectancy under the HCFA life expectancy tables. When the annuitant dies then either the family or the Commonwealth of Massachusetts Division of Medical Assistance gets the remaining funds depending on very specific rules.

 But there are several other options for elders and their families facing long term care financing and Medicaid qualification. There is an exception for the principal residence where the nursing home resident's spouse is still living in the home. This exception also applies to siblings, minor, blind or disabled children. The other major exception is for children who are caregivers for their parents (the "caregiver exemption") in the two years prior to the elder's nursing home admission.

 From an estate planning perspective and for non-real estate assets, our choices are more limited. Besides the Medicaid Annuity, Special Needs Trusts can also be used without disqualification for anyone in the Medicaid applicant's family. Disqualification for Medicaid is the term used by the Massachusetts Division of Medical Assistance (MassHealth) to describe the time period for which a Medicaid applicant or nursing home patient is ineligible for Medicaid benefits.

 Of course, advance estate planning can solve a lot of these Medicaid qualification issues. Generally, if an elder client is in good health,  under 80 years of age and has the wherewithal to pay annual premiums, then Long Term Care Insurance is a great option. Premiums can be costly on a cash basis, but I have never had an elder law client who had has a claim with her Long Term Care Insurance company complain about the benefits. The benefits are generally cash payments for home care and nursing home care. Many people call Long Term Care Insurance "nursing home insurance," but it is really much more than that as it also includes a home- care benefit.

 With the same foresight as an insurance applicant, elder law clients at Gosselin Law are often advised when they are healthy (or as I like to say "when you are still buying green bananas") to set up irrevocable trusts that preserve the step-up in tax basis and remove the elder law client's assets from inclusion in their resource calculation by MassHealth. The "trick" is that after setting up and funding these types of Medicaid trusts, the elder is not elegible for Medicaid for five years. At one time the waiting period was much shorter on transfers and trusts, but now, it is a uniform five years before the trust's Medicaid "protections" kick in.

That's about it for asset protection and Medicaid qualification. Whatever you do, do not apply for Medicaid without speaking with an elder law attorney, no matter how much the nursing home pushes you to sign papers or an application company, such as Medi-Services encourages you to 'just get it done' - keep your pen in your pocket until you speak with an elder law attorney. If you are facing the spectre of paying the outrageous costs of a Massachusetts nursing home from your own funds, please call Gosselin Law for a free telephone consultation to review your Medicaid asset protection options. Our phone number is (toll free) 877-325-6746 or 781-729-0313. We have offices throughout Massachusetts (Boston, Hingham, Wellesley, Winchester and serve Amherst, New Bedford, Barnstable and Pittsfield through satellite and in-home appointments.

 

• Print
• Comments
• Trackbacks

I admire Roto Rooter. Few other businesses are so financially successful using a single tool - such as the spiraling drain cleaning tool. As an elder law and Medicaid attorney in Massachusetts I am starting to feel like Roto Rooter. New Medicaid regulations and qualifications have made it nearly impossible at the time of nursing home admission to protect an elder's assets. Despite the strict guidelines and pre-planning requirements of the Deficit Reduction Act and interim state and federal regulation, we are still winning the battle of family asset protection. If you are facing the spectre of paying the outrageous costs of a Massachusetts nursing home from your own funds please call Law for Life for a free telephone consultation to review your Medicaid asset protection options. Our phone number is (toll free) 877-325-6746 or 781-782-6000. We have offices throughout Massachusetts (Boston, Hingham, Wellesley, Winchester and serve the Worcester, Springfield, New Bedford/Fall River, Barnstable and Pittsfield areas through satellite and in-home appointments.

Often our only tool in Massachusetts is the Medicaid Qualifying Immediate Annuity, also called Single Premium Immediate Annuity (or SPIA). Although pooled income trusts have their place, we are not convinced that they will be available much longer as an emergency planning tool. These annuities are quite simple, the Medicaid applicant or their community spouse contributes a lump of funds to an annuity account with an insurance company and the insurance company returns the money to the annuitant over a fixed period of time consistent with their life expectancy under the HCFA life expectancy tables. When the annuitant dies then either the family or the Commonwealth of Massachusetts Division of Medical Assistance gets the funds depending very specific rules.

But there are several other options for elders and their families facing long term care financing and Medicaid qualification. There are exception for the principal residence where the nursing home resident's spouse is still living in the home. Same with siblings, minor, blind or disabled children. The other major exception is for children who are caregivers for their parents (the "caregiver exemption") in the two years prior to the elder's nursing home admission.

From an estate planning perspective and for non-real estate assets, our choices are more limited. There is the Medicaid Annuity (for which Law for Life is recognized as a Massachusetts source for the design and implementation of annuity based plans), but also the use of Special Needs Trusts that can be establish without disqualification for anyone in the Medicaid applicant's family. Disqualification for Medicaid is the term used by the Massachusetts Division of Medical Assistance (MassHealth) to describe the time period for which a Medicaid applicant or nursing home patient is ineligible for Medicaid benefits.

Of course, advance estate planning can solve a lot of these Medicaid qualification issues. If an elder client has good health, is generally under 80 years of age and has the wherewithal to pay annual premiums then Long Term Care Insurance is a great option. Premiums can be costly on a cash basis, but I have never had an elder law client that went on claim with Long Term Care Insurance complain about the benefits. The benefits are generally cash payments for home care and nursing home care. Many people call Long Term Care Insurance "nursing home insurance", but it is really much more than that as it includes a home care benefit that can be even more important to elders in need of services.

With the same foresight as an insurance applicant, elder law clients at Law for Life are often advised when they are healthy (I like to say "when you are still buying green bananas") to set up irrevocable trusts that preserve the step-up in tax basis and remove the elder law client's assets from inclusion in their resource calculation by MassHealth. The "trick" is that after setting up and funding these types of Medicaid trusts, the elder cannot qualify (or apply) for Medicaid for five years. At one time the waiting period was much shorter on transfers and trusts, but now it is a uniform five years before the trust's Medicaid protections kick in.

That's about it for asset protection and Medicaid qualification. It is imperative to speak with a competent elder law attorney such as us experts at Law for Life (our phone number is 781-782-6000 or toll free at 877-325-6746) regarding your personal situation as the regulations are very complex and change often during the year. Whatever you do, do not apply for Medicaid without speaking with an elder law attorney, no matter how much the nursing home pushes you to sign papers or an application company, such as Medi-Services encourages you to 'just get it done' - keep your pen in your pocket until you speak with an elder law attorney.

• Print
• Comments
• Trackbacks

Reverse mortgages are bad mortgage products. Reverse mortgages cost too much in closing costs. Reverse mortgages drain the equity from elders' estates. Reverse mortgage originators prey on the weakest among us. Or so pundits that sell houses, annuities and all manner of ignorant self interested "protectors" of the elderly repeat as if a mantra to ward off the evil of reverse mortgages. Of course, the truth could not be further from their fears.

The US Government needs the baby boomers to embrace reverse mortgages. After all, the national debt has more numbers than my Comcast account, Halliburton needs to keep profitable in Iraq and Americans are living (and getting Social Security and Medicaid benefits) longer than ever. The actuaries tell us that it's not the interest on the national debt, foreign aid or war that will bankrupt the US Government, but rather Medicaid has the power to overwhelm the entire GDP. Where is the money that will pay for all of Uncle Sam' hospital bills?

Medicaid is an issue for the reverse mortgage industry, especially for the reverse mortgage originators that don't know their products and underwriting well enough to advise their customers on the traps. I have been featured recently in the Mortgage Press and the National Reverse Mortgage Lenders Association national teleconference and newsletters as an expert in the intersection of Medicaid regulations and the origination of reverse mortgages.

Here is one of the articles, excerpts from an interview with Atare Agbamu (who writes extensively on reverse mortgage issues):

Traps for the Wary: Reverse Mortgages and Healthcare Benefits -- a conversation with Elder Law Attorney John Gosselin

By Atare E. Agbamu, CRMS

They say old age hardly comes alone. It comes with issues. The same can be said of reverse mortgages, the new pillars of retirement security in these precarious times.

Reverse mortgages come with issues, government healthcare benefits issues. The relationship with government healthcare benefits is deeper and more challenging than most originators and customers suspect.

To help us understand the connection and its implications for originators and customers, I spoke with Winchester, Massachusetts-based elder law attorney John T. Gosselin.

The Managing Attorney of his own law firm, Gosselin & Associates, P C, with offices in Massachusetts and New Hampshire, Mr. Gosselin is one of a few lawyers, in my experience, who really understand reverse mortgages, particularly how they mix with other elder law issues.

Besides overseeing a vibrant probate administration and elder law work, Mr. Gosselin runs a thriving real estate practice, acting as counsel or closing agent in more than 20,000 transactions, advising clients on purchase and sale agreements, mortgages, financial, and title disputes.

A member of the National Reverse Mortgage Lenders Association (NRMLA), Mr. Gosselin has advised and represented lenders in reverse mortgage situations for more than 10 years.

As you will find from our conversation, Mr. Gosselin has thought these issues through. His knowledge, insights, and suggestions will help you serve your customers better. They could help your company avoid some difficult issues too. [Disclaimer: Nothing in this article should be considered legal advice. Seek competent counsel for your unique situation.] The following is a transcript of our conversation.

Atare E. Agbamu: John, what is the loss of Medicaid Eligibility risk for the typical reverse mortgage borrower?

John T. Gosselin: The big risk is being over asset. The way you qualify for Medicaid benefits is to be poor. Medicaid is welfare. So in order to qualify for welfare, you need to be poor. And the government defines poor as a combination of assets and resources. And they define it all as available resources. That's the term that is used. If you have more available resources than the limits that are allowed by law, you cannot qualify for benefits.

The first risk is a borrower holds too much cash in their name, by virtue of holding too much cash, either through a lump-sum distribution from a reverse mortgage or drawing too much down from a HECM [government-insured reverse mortgage] or drawing a small amount from a HECM but not spending it. A lot of our borrowers in the reverse world are used to living on very low amounts of money. So when they start drawing from a HECM, they feel uncomfortable spending it. I have seen that happen where the borrower accumulates relatively modest payments over a short period of time to put them over the asset limits.

The asset limit, commonly, for an individual person, is about $2,000 in liquid resources, in addition to their principal residence. They are allowed to have a principal residence, but they can't have more than $2,000 in total liquid assets at the end of any month. So at the end of any month, they can't have more than $2,000 standing in their name and receive Medicaid benefits.

So the risk is that they are going to draw down or borrow more than what is allowed. By doing that, if they are over age 65, as almost all our reverse borrowers would be, it will automatically put them in situations where they are either going to be disqualified for benefits and/or subject to reimbursement for benefits they have already received. That is the risk specific to Medicaid.

There is another risk which is also related, Supplemental Security Income (SSI), which is an additional welfare program. It is intended mainly for people who are very poor, who have neither Social Security nor virtually any social security income. This is another scheme which the federal government provides for its poorest people. Generally, these are people who never paid into the system by working at jobs which provide for federal social security and insurance benefits. It is not an insurance program; it is a federal welfare benefit. And that program has very strict income guidelines.

Although a HECM advance doesn't disqualify them as income, there is a risk of going over the asset limits. There is income that is assumed to come from those assets. There is a formula that is done. If they are holding too much in assets, they can be disqualified from SSI. Again, holding too much cash is a problem. Having money in a given month is not a problem. They could draw down tens of thousands of dollars if they spend it for their own personal needs, their care, and their protection. They can really spend it for anything. They are spending an asset that is protected, which is their house. At the end of 30 days, they better get that asset back under $2,000. At the end of each month, their cash has got to be under $2,000. And they could not have accumulated other easily liquidated assets, like buying jewelry, for example. They can't buy more than one motor vehicle for their own use. They can't accumulate collectible assets. They can't go out and buy antique furniture that is going to carry a cash value or easily liquidated value. So they are somewhat restricted in how they use their funds, but not terribly.

One other dimension that people should be aware of (I don't expect this to occur often) is that the tenure payment could be construed as income. We usually say that reverse mortgage payouts are never income, that it is always drawing against the value of the house, but the reality is that when the balance of the mortgage exceeds the value of the collateral, it can be recognized as income; because, effectively, it is no longer a loan because the proceeds are exceeding the value of the collateral. The IRS would recognize that as a form of taxable annuity income. That could run into some problems.

Now why I say it shouldn't come up much is that the tenure payment is fairly conservative. The formula used to come up with the numbers really anticipate someone living quite some time before the loan gets upside down; but, in a declining real estate market, you could, potentially, see that become an issue in the future.

AA: From your experience, how valuable is Medicaid Eligibility to the average senior person? For it to be a serious loss, it has got to be pretty valuable.

JG: For the average senior, they are probably going to be receiving Medicare benefits because that is an insurance program that people pay in when they work, and they work for wages. The vast majority of people over 65 are on Medicare benefits.

The Medicaid benefits we are talking about will affect reverse mortgages. It could be supporting a spouse that is in a nursing home. For example, if we have a wife that is in the community and a husband in a nursing home, the wife in the community (it varies by state) on average, is allowed to keep the principal residence and approximately $100,000 in assets. It does vary. More or less, it is $100,000. If she goes over the asset limit, she can disqualify her spouse for the benefits that they are receiving for the husband's care and possibly be forced to reimburse benefits already received.

Most often, I think, when a spouse of someone who is borrowing on a reverse is in a facility [nursing home], they are disqualifying the spouse often unknowingly. This is one of the traps for originators. They should inquire whether or not a spouse is in a nursing facility and determine how that spouse is paying for their care. Sometimes the spouse will no longer be on title so the topic does not come up unless a direct inquiry is made.

There are other ways to pay for nursing care. One of them could be VA [Veteran Administration]. The VA is very low cost, and it doesn't really impact reverses as it is tied to service record and not only financial need. There are also religious and community organizations that provide unique living situations for elders, many of these require turning over large lump sums in favor of lifetime care contracts. Home care services are also coming along that will essentially enable seniors to have nursing care at home on a somewhat more affordable basis. Another place Medicaid comes in is community Medicaid.

Community Medicaid is a program that supplements Medicare. Again, it is generally for the poorest people, both seniors and those under 65. The people whose income and ability to pay for what Medicare doesn't pay for is compromised, so they would go for Medicaid benefits in the community, or they need some special services or in-home care through a variety of community programs.

There are in-home care programs that are coming up every day now in every state, where instead of going to a nursing home, the state will subsidize a certain amount of in-home care. It is that in-home care we need to be concerned with because if it is under the Medicaid program, it is subject to reimbursement. Think of Medicaid like a loan from the government.

AA: So this is a very valuable program for the average senior because it protects their health, right?

JG: The Medicaid program we are talking about is a community health insurance benefit. This pays for every aspect of medical care. It pays for prescriptions. It pays for hospitalization. It pays for virtually any medical need of an elderly person. You could have reimbursement obligations in the millions of dollars for somebody who has a serious illness.

You could have someone who has MS [multiple sclerosis], Lou Gehrig's disease, or a form of cancer that has received hundreds of thousands or even millions of dollars worth of care through the Medicaid system. Yes, it is absolutely a valuable benefit.

To lose the benefit for people who are receiving the benefit would probably be catastrophic. They could put themselves in situations where their medical debt could consume the value of their house. If they have no other means of paying for their medical debt, they could be forced into bankruptcy for their medical debt.

The US government needs to find a way to use the wealth stored in home equity for people's care, I think we'll see a much simpler reverse mortgage product coming very soon, like a low interest rate reverse mortgage that's sold directly or at least wholly subsidized by the US Government to get at people's home equity for elders' medical and home care needs.

 

• Print
• Comments
• Trackbacks

The son of philanthropist Brooke Astor was accused in an indictment unsealed Tuesday of plundering his mother's $198 million estate and conspiring to have the Alzheimer's-stricken socialite sign a new will leaving her fortune to him.

I guess this shows us that the rich are just like everyone else. Greed is no more a condition of poverty than hunger is a condition of obesity. Humans with a nature to cause harm to their families for their own profit come in all shapes and sizes. Brooke Astor is no more immune to her family's greed than any other elderly woman suffering from the ravages of dementia. Probate, estate taxes and trust issues for the rich are the same as for everyone else - just magnified by the scale of wealth.

A big part of our estate planning process is developing strategies to prevent abuse of the elderly. Using co-fiduciaries, professional trust services and checks and balances built into our documents, we are able to give our clients strong lines of defense. Brooke Astor may have had access to the best lawyers in the United States because of her wealth, but without an understanding of elder law and the dangers of elder abuse, even the best lawyer in Boston cannot imagine the opportunity for fraud within a parent-child relationship. Our experience tells us that the "big firm" lawyers are ill equipped to deal with what is often more social work than legal work.

Our practice is to approach mental health issues in our elderly clients as a multi-disciplinary issue. Working closely with medical providers, financial planners and social workers we craft bespoke plans that respect each individual client's unique personal situation. House, hospital or nursing home calls are commonplace in what we do, how else could we know how our clients live? Ask your downtown Boston lawyer to visit the nursing home on a Saturday morning.

In her day Brooke Astor, was a great philanthropist. In a great twist she will continue to be philanthropic through her own son's misdeeds by giving America an example of greed to the umpteenth degree. For elder law lawyers, Santa Claus could not have brought a more perfect Christmas present for elder parents than the example of the consequences of poor planning. Do your grandparents, parents and self a favor and give the affordable Christmas gift of good estate planning. And, yes, I would be happy to sell you a gift certificate for estate planning!

 

• Print
• Comments
• Trackbacks