Reverse Mortgage - What You Need to Know from A Massachusetts Elder Law Attorney

Reverse Mortgage: Gimmick or Good Deal?

Today, several of the new skin products being marketed tout that they can reverse the signs of aging. They make claims that they can remove wrinkles or increase energy or improve memory. I don't know if any of these products can deliver on their claims. But for seniors 62-years-old or older who own (or almost own) the home they live in, there is a way to reverse one thing in their lives, the mortgage on their homes.

How? In a typical mortgage, a home owner pays the bank a monthly amortized amount. In a reverse mortgage, a home owner pays the bank a monthly amortized amount. Does this sound too good to be true? Is this another anti-aging product gimmick? It's not. For many seniors, a reverse mortgage is a sound financial planning tool, and according to Brett Kirkpatrick of Mortgage Financial Services , "A reverse mortgage might be the ideal option for seniors to maintain their financial independence."

Some Reverse Mortgage History

Reverse mortgages have been available in the United States since 1961 but with considerable variation from one region of the country to another. In 1991 the Federal government expanded its insurance of reverse mortgages, thereby increasing availability across the map. With the rising cost of healthcare, unanticipated increases in inflation, pension plans going under and the unpredictable nature of Social Security, more seniors are looking towards their houses for the cash they need.

In fact, as property values have risen, a number of seniors who took out reverse mortgage loans years ago are returning for second and even third reverse mortgages to harvest the additional equity that has built up in their homes. "Most senior homeowners just want to remain comfortable in their own home." states Ed Barrett, a reverse mortgage expert from Your Home for Life in Westwood, Mass. "With the rising costs of everything today, that is becoming harder and harder to do. Now, with the federally insured reverse mortgage, there is a new option available that really provides for financial security and peace of mind. It really can be 'Your Home For Life'." According to the Federal Housing Administration, which insures most reverse mortgages, by September of 2005, homeowners had taken out about 43,000 reverse mortgages, up from about 37,800 the year before and from 7,700 in 2001. The demand continues to rise with 56% more loans taken out in the first quarter of 2006 than in 2005.

The Ins & Outs of Reverse Mortgages

To qualify for a reverse mortgage, at least one person on the home's title must be 62 years old, the home must be the owner's primary residence (i.e., the homeowner must actually live in the home) and the home must be owned outright or the reverse mortgage loan must be used to pay off the outstanding mortgage balance.

The Federal reverse mortgage loan program has a cap on the size of the mortgage loan it provides, so for those seeking amounts in excess of the Federal limits, state programs and private lenders are a better choice. For both Federal and state programs, there may be restrictions on the types of residences that qualify. For example, under the Federal program condos are eligible, but shareholder-owned cooperatives are not. In Massachusetts, SFR, MFR (1-4 units), Condo's, and HUD-approved manufactured housing are all eligible. Loans generally are written for no more than one-half to two-thirds the value of a home and even if the value of the home changes while the loan is outstanding, the borrower only owes the amount of the loan. The repayment amount can never exceed the value of the home. In fact, under the Federal program, the government makes up the deficiency, if any, to the lending institution, and while Private Placement programs are not insured, all are "non-recourse".

The borrower decides how to receive the loan money. There are four payment options: (1) an up-front lump sum payment; (2) a line of credit; (3) fixed monthly payments; and (4) a combination of a line of credit and fixed monthly payments. With any of these options there are fees and costs, but many of these are the same fees and costs that would be incurred with any loan. For example, there is an origination fee, an up-front mortgage insurance fee, an appraisal fee, and standard closing costs. As far as Uncle Sam is concerned, the money received from a reverse mortgage is not taxable as income, regardless of the way the money is paid. Likewise, many states do not consider reverse mortgages as income. They are not count ed as disqualifying resources for most Federal and state public assistance programs.

A reverse mortgage must be carefully evaluated as it is more complex than other secured loans (like home equity loans, for example). It is suggested that seniors considering one seek the advice of a legal, tax or financial advisor. In fact, the law requires that seniors receive counseling before they obtain a loan. Typically, such counseling covers budgeting and general financial planning, as well as the tax implications and Medicaid/public assistance ramifications. The AARP, Fannie Mae and HUD are three agencies that provide counselor referrals. As previously mentioned, reverse mortgage loans contain fees and costs. However, the fees and costs are low and are not paid out of pocket or up front. They are added to the total loan amount along with the interest, and are paid when the loan's term expires. If a borrower's reverse mortgage is structured as monthly payments "for life", his or her estate may end up paying off the loan.

The Federal reverse mortgage program assumes a life expectancy of 100 years, thus, monthly payments may be lower for seniors closer to age 62 than for those nearer to 100. The life expectancy assumed by Massachusetts, as well as for all other programs is 100 years. One thing about reverse mortgages that seems to worry most seniors is that having a reverse mortgage loan will prevent their children and grandchildren from inheriting their home.

Seniors who want to ensure that their heirs are provided for could take advantage of the new transfer rules under the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005 (passed in 2006) which allows, among other things, transfers made five years before their application for Medicaid to be outside the "look-back period". Being outside the "look-back period" means that the seniors will not be penalized for the transfer. For example, if a senior gives some of her savings and investments to her grandchildren five years before she needs Medicaid, she qualify immediately, provided of course, that she is careful not to make it seem like the transfer was made for the sole purpose of qualifying. Even if seniors do not take advantage of the new transfer rules, the rising costs of real estate should protect the home for their heirs, who can sell the house and use the proceeds to pay off the reverse mortgage note and keep the profit. In fact under the Deficit Reduction Act, seniors with more mortgage on their home may fair better (in some circumstances) that those who have higher equity.

The new law's limit of $500,000 on home equity (which can be increased up to $750,000 at state option) may well mean that seniors owning homes with greater equity could risk not qualifying for Medicaid coverage. If the equity is tapped using a reverse mortgage loan,  seniors may be sheltered from disqualification.

Because You Were Curious: Other Home Equity Conversion Mechanisms The desire of seniors to utilize the value of their homes' equity, while continuing to live in their homes has led to banks offering various other home equity conversion mechanisms in addition to reverse mortgages. Home equity loans, sale-leasebacks and financial arrangements in which seniors retain a life interest in the home while selling the remainder interest are other options for seniors to harness the equity in their homes. However, none of these are as beneficial to seniors or are as easy to obtain as a reverse mortgage.

For example, most home equity loans require that the borrower demonstrate a dependable source of income that can support monthly re-payment obligations. As a result, most seniors in retirement are not likely to have the income that is necessary to obtain a home equity loan. In a sale-leaseback (where the home is sold and then simultaneously leased back to the person for life) or a sale of a remainder interest transaction (where the homeowner retains a life estate in the home while selling the remainder interest) a major concern, in each of these transactions, is that it may be difficult to find a suitable buyer who is willing to buy the home subject to the sort of leasehold restrictions that an older homeowner requires. In sale-leaseback and remainder interest transactions, there are also tax and public assistance issues that may not make these viable options for seniors.

Reverse Mortgage in Summary

A reverse mortgage is a financial planning tool that is increasingly being used by senior homeowners from all walks of life. They are an attractive option that allows seniors across the economic spectrum to have more cash by increasing the liquidity of an asset that most do not think of as liquid, a home. According to Ed Barrett of Your Home For Life, "Reverses offer a better quality of life for those who need more cash flow than offered by a pension or social security benefits and enable much needed repairs to your home to be made, all without making a single monthly payment," and while reverse mortgages can't remove wrinkles, increase energy or improve memory, they do help seniors lead a richer and more rewarding life.

AARP Homeowner Survey - Reverse Mortgage

On the 20th anniversary of the law, that established the reverse mortgage program, reverse mortgages are getting a closer look thanks to a Senate hearing and a new report by the AARP. The AARP's Public Policy Institute released a report on homeowners' attitudes and satisfaction with reverse mortgages. The report finds that while consumers' opinions of reverse mortgages are generally favorable, high costs are a big deterrent to purchasing a reverse mortgage. The AARP released the report at a Senate Special Committee on Aging hearing.

The AARP surveyed homeowners who had taken out loans and homeowners who had decided against loans in addition to surveying the general public on their awareness of reverse mortgages. The report found that, in general, reverse mortgage borrowers have a favorable opinion of their loans. Ninety-three percent of borrowers said their reverse mortgages had a positive effect on their lives, and 58 percent of borrowers indicated that the loan had completely met their needs. According to the report, the biggest reason for not purchasing a reverse mortgage is the high cost.

The AARP report also highlighted some reverse mortgage companies: problem of overly aggressive marketing. According to the report, lenders offered 9 percent of borrowers additional financial products, such as annuities and long-term care insurance, which may not be good investment choices given the high cost of the mortgages. In addition, the Senate panel also heard testimony from family members of those negatively impacted by reverse mortgages and advocates for the elderly who warned that unscrupulous sales agents sometimes promote reverse mortgages in order to generate funding to purchase annuity products.

The AARP report concludes with recommendations to make reverse mortgages a more mainstream option for homeowners, including recommendations for reducing costs, improving consumer counseling and information, and improving the marketing practices of lenders.

AARP Nursing Centers of America - (Baby) Booming Business

I was mulling what nursing homes will be like when it's my time for one. After all, my work brings me to these homes almost every day.

First, I expect a lot of competition to sell me a bed, since there will be many more available than needed, so they'll have to offer me incentives to move in. "Free haircuts for life for the first 10 residents. Buy one bed, get another for half-price."

The homes will be far different than they are today. I would expect my nursing home to be named like a major sports stadium, AARP Nursing Centers of America or the Depends Elder Spectrum. Gone will be the TV game shows and nightly bingo - we'll have oldies like Nintendo and Playstation to aggravate our arthritis. On TV, we'll watch reruns of Grey's Anatomy, Family Guy and American Idol.

Instead of that ubiquitous soothing waltz music, we'll have real Muzak oldies like AC/DC, Smashing Pumpkins, and the Black Eyed Peas to keep us moving rhythmically in our rocking chairs.

And if we are out on the porch in the rocking chairs, what to wear? Style matters. How about Abercrombie & Fitch's line of easy access night gowns for geriatric women? And from REI, the Marmot Gortex Elder Pants, now with stain and odor protection. Options include special pockets for the ipod, dentures and the colostomy bag.

Wheelchairs will have flip-out laptops, handy for text messaging our fellow residents. And of course chairs will have GPS gear so we and they will know where we are headed and where we are, should we forget.

Gone will be the dishwater-flavored coffee of today, along with tasteless mush and muck they call meals. We'll get double, no-fat soy vanilla lattes with whipped from the Starbucks' traveling baristas and the Meals on Wheels cart will stock Ring Dings, Ben & Jerry's Chunky Monkey - and every other Thursday - Trans Fat Feast Night! (brought to you by Crisco)- oh the good 'ol days.

Seriously, assisted living facilities and nursing homes are changing with the times - and there is a new trend - identifying and supplying the preferences of their residents. Drab gray institutions simply won't cut the mustard when us boomers are ready for the homes. My dotage may be something to look forward to yet.

Long Life - Law for Life - Alzheimer's Rising

The Law for Life Update for June 20, 2008<p/>
<p/>
US life expectancy rises; rates of death from Alzheimer's rise dramatically<p/>
<p/>
U.S. life expectancy hit a record high of 78.1 years in 2006 while Alzheimer's disease moved up to No. 6 on the list of leading causes of death, U.S. health officials said on Wednesday.  Rates for 14 of the top 15 causes of death fell in 2006, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention said in a report. Influenza and pneumonia deaths had the steepest drop, at 13 percent, compared to the previous year.  The life expectancy at birth of 78.1 years was up from a then-record of 77.8 years in 2005, continuing a rise going back decades, the CDC said.  Life expectancy for women (80.7 years) continued to exceed that for men (75.4 years). Racial disparities persisted as well, with white women's life expectancy at 81 years compared to 76.9 for black women and white men's life expectancy at 76 years compared to 70 for black men.  Infant mortality fell in 2006 to 6.7 infant deaths per 1,000 live births, down from 6.9 per 1,000 in 2005, according to the CDC. It still remains higher than many rich nations.  Heart disease, which killed 629,191 people, and cancer, which killed 560,102 people, remained the two top causes of death, followed by stroke, chronic lower respiratory diseases such as emphysema and accidents.  Alzheimer's disease, the most common form of dementia in the elderly, leapfrogged diabetes to become the sixth-leading cause of death, killing 72,914 Americans in 2006.  The number of people with Alzheimer's is projected to rise steadily in the coming decades as the proportion of elderly people in the U.S. population increases.  The Alzheimer's Association said that up to 5.2 million Americans have Alzheimer's.<p/>
<p/>
Source:  Reuters Health (11 June 2008)<p/>
Full story: <p/> http://www.reutershealth.com/archive/2008/06/11/eline/links/20080611elin022.html

Death and its Wake - So Sorry You Need A Funeral Home

A few months back my barber became seriously ill. Since I get my haircut about once every 6 weeks or so, I happened to come to the barber shop at the beginning of the "bad news cycle" that the other barbers in the shop had started. These old Italian men quite emotionally described how their brother barber had fallen ill, the grave prognosis, his family's sorrows, the distress on his friends, etc. It was quite a natural outpouring of woe about everyone's mutual friend.

Because of a probate court date I needed a trim about a month later, I was met once again with the news of the barber's illness, he'll be out until March, his wife has taken time from work, etc... It was quite matter of fact really, but they needed to tell me as I had asked "how's he doing?" This got me thinking about how there is a whole exercise around communicating about grief. How we become accustomed to repeating dreadful things. "Yes, he went quickly, the bus driver was cited for speeding." "Mother fought cancer for years, it's a blessing she's gone." "I just woke up and there he was, he never woke up."

Anyone that has stood in the receiving line at a wake has taken part in the modern grief dance. The mourner says "I'm so sorry for your loss"; the family member says "thank you for coming, it would have meant a lot to old Ed." Rinse, wash, repeat. I'm not a psychologist, but I think there's some harm in wakes. Originally wakes were apparently held to ward off evil spirits (by staying awake with the body) until you got the body in the ground. Wakes then evolved to be a form of confirmation of death and social event. Until fairly recently in human history wakes were always held in the family's home. Either dead people started having more friends or someone saw a business opportunity in using their living room for wakes and the "funeral parlor" was born.

Me, I'd be perfectly happy to be waked in my front hall. The wake is an event for the living, not the dead. It's a time to bring families together to mourn, grieve and share stories of the dear departed. But wouldn't it be nice for a widow not to have to explain how her husband got stuck in the snowblower last Thursday 400 times? I propose a new model for wakes. First, let's do them in happy places, like Cheesecake Factory or the Museum of Fine Arts (another business opportunity for AARP?). Seriously, the body will be happy whereever it's placed and frankly it's only our more recent generations where all things humans are pasteurized and sterilized. In many countries bodies are buried quickly after death (mainly for the practical purpose of avoiding the consequences of hot weather), but also to dispatch the corpse so that there can be a celebration of the person's life through various forms of mourning. Heck, maybe the Probate Court could be a positive place for families to come together? I've always wanted to officiate a reading of the will like you see in movies, maybe it could be a new tradition to have a will read at a social event for the recently departed? As outlandish as these ideas may seem, our customs change over time - influenced by the tastes and preferences of people. Americans like convenience and America, Inc. likes to sell at every turn - watch out for commercialism of this most sacred time, too.

I think having a positive venue for a wake and funeral sends the message that the family continues to live. I think obituaries could be a bit more truthful as well to avoid the inevitable "how did she die?" question. How hard would it be to add a short line that says "Mary was walking along Main Street last Tuesday when a tiger that had recently escaped from the zoo caused her untimely death." I will say I like what the Boston Globe has done with their obituary section recently. The Boston Globe has added the option (for a price) of adding a photograph of the decedent. I am always drawn to these people's pictures. Today, sadly, there was a two month old baby's picture. The other day there was a Marine in his dress blues that is not coming home from far off lands. It's good to see that the dead are like us, not only old, but all ages. Death is a great equalizer - it doesn't know class, race or creed. It is one of life's certainties, and I believe the more we embrace proper estate planning, communication between family members about last wishes and the inevitability of death, the less stressful our deaths will be for the loved ones that we leave behind. Those who know me know that I love to boat and fish in Boston Harbor. A funeral director friend of mine has a boat berthed near mine, her name is "No Wake Today."

Estate Planning: What to Live For

October is my favorite month of the year for estate planning. It is the essence of fall. It is the gateway to winter and analogously, to the Winter of our lives.

October as a time of reflection on life is not lost on Major League Baseball. MLB's slogan for October is "I Life for This". Well, I don't. I mean, I do love baseball. I love the Red Sox. I especially love October baseball. But I don't live for 18 men playing ball for millions of dollars. Baseball is a pastime.

What do we live for? Elders, facing the scourge of aging and the loss of those dear to them, lose clear reasons to live. It is not uncommon for me, when visiting an elderly client at a nursing home, to hear weak voices telling anyone who will listen they want to die.

We live for hope. We live for tomorrow. Without that, death is a comfortable option. What's bothering me is the power of the media, America, Inc., and the organized establishment's role in shaping what they thing retirement and aging should look like for millions of Americans. They employ a cadre of image and word specialists to create viewers, customers and members of organizations.

Take AARP, which after an odd name change, no longer stands for anything - It's just AARP (rhymes with carp, except in Boston where it rhymes with no work in our vocabulary). It is an organization solely committed to delivering the most efficient database of Americans old enough to obtain personal credit (OK, they have some standards - you need to be of "retirement" age, which is defined as age 50).

AARP is essentially a big insurance agency, a vast department store and pharmacy with a direct mail business for every pill pusher, gadget and ointment and older American needs to make life complete. Their mission is to sell and to promote the sale of all manner of tschochkes they think older Americans need to live a good and active life.

The media likewise are entwined with pharmaceutical giants in an effort to maintain fear in the minds of the aged so they can sell them salves and potions.

My generation rarely watches the evening news. How do I know? Well, frankly, how many of us need Lipitor, Viagra, Zoloff or any other little pill? The media machine's news function is largely sponsored by Merck, Pfizer, Novartis and others pandering their trademarked brand for all that ails you.

Many older people watch the news out of fear the world is coming to an end. And it is. Just not today, or in your hometown of Suburbia, USA. I think all of this careful and manipulative branding of what it means to age in America is going to be lost wholesale to the baby boomer generation's unique perspective on things. For one, improved health and increased personal debt will keep them in the workforce for many more years. Retirement, what's that?

Technological connections and improved access to information should help boomers comparison shop for services and test the vapid claims of unscrupulous salesmen.

Last, boomers are tired of being boomers. Seriously, how many times do you need to hear you were the product of your parents' pent-up sexual energy, after years of war in foreign lands? These people were rock'n rollers, hippies, yippies, yuppies, dinks and now boomers. They have had enough of labels. I'm looking forward to watching boomers break the media-imposed aging model AARP and the pharmaceutical machine has so carefully created for them.

Death and its Wake - So Sorry You Need A Funeral Home

A few months back my barber became seriously ill. Since I get my haircut about once every 6 weeks or so, I happened to come to the barber shop at the beginning of the "bad news cycle" that the other barbers in the shop had started. These old Italian men quite emotionally described how their brother barber had fallen ill, the grave prognosis, his family's sorrows, the distress on his friends, etc. It was quite a natural outpouring of woe about everyone's mutual friend.

Because of a probate court date I needed a trim about a month later, I was met once again with the news of the barber's illness, he'll be out until March, his wife has taken time from work, etc... It was quite matter of fact really, but they needed to tell me as I had asked "how's he doing?" This got me thinking about how there is a whole exercise around communicating about grief. How we become accustomed to repeating dreadful things. "Yes, he went quickly, the bus driver was cited for speeding." "Mother fought cancer for years, it's a blessing she's gone." "I just woke up and there he was, he never woke up."

Anyone that has stood in the receiving line at a wake has taken part in the modern grief dance. The mourner says "I'm so sorry for your loss"; the family member says "thank you for coming, it would have meant a lot to old Ed." Rinse, wash, repeat. I'm not a psychologist, but I think there's some harm in wakes. Originally wakes were apparently held to ward off evil spirits (by staying awake with the body) until you got the body in the ground. Wakes then evolved to be a form of confirmation of death and social event. Until fairly recently in human history wakes were always held in the family's home. Either dead people started having more friends or someone saw a business opportunity in using their living room for wakes and the "funeral parlor" was born.

Me, I'd be perfectly happy to be waked in my front hall. The wake is an event for the living, not the dead. It's a time to bring families together to mourn, grieve and share stories of the dear departed. But wouldn't it be nice for a widow not to have to explain how her husband got stuck in the snowblower last Thursday 400 times? I propose a new model for wakes. First, let's do them in happy places, like Cheesecake Factory or the Museum of Fine Arts (another business opportunity for AARP?). Seriously, the body will be happy whereever it's placed and frankly it's only our more recent generations where all things humans are pasteurized and sterilized. In many countries bodies are buried quickly after death (mainly for the practical purpose of avoiding the consequences of hot weather), but also to dispatch the corpse so that there can be a celebration of the person's life through various forms of mourning. Heck, maybe the Probate Court could be a positive place for families to come together? I've always wanted to officiate a reading of the will like you see in movies, maybe it could be a new tradition to have a will read at a social event for the recently departed? As outlandish as these ideas may seem, our customs change over time - influenced by the tastes and preferences of people. Americans like convenience and America, Inc. likes to sell at every turn - watch out for commercialism of this most sacred time, too.

I think having a positive venue for a wake and funeral sends the message that the family continues to live. I think obituaries could be a bit more truthful as well to avoid the inevitable "how did she die?" question. How hard would it be to add a short line that says "Mary was walking along Main Street last Tuesday when a tiger that had recently escaped from the zoo caused her untimely death." I will say I like what the Boston Globe has done with their obituary section recently. The Boston Globe has added the option (for a price) of adding a photograph of the decedent. I am always drawn to these people's pictures. Today, sadly, there was a two month old baby's picture. The other day there was a Marine in his dress blues that is not coming home from far off lands. It's good to see that the dead are like us, not only old, but all ages. Death is a great equalizer - it doesn't know class, race or creed. It is one of life's certainties, and I believe the more we embrace proper estate planning, communication between family members about last wishes and the inevitability of death, the less stressful our deaths will be for the loved ones that we leave behind. Those who know me know that I love to boat and fish in Boston Harbor. A funeral director friend of mine has a boat berthed near mine, her name is "No Wake Today."

Estate Planning: What to Live For

October is my favorite month of the year for estate planning. It is the essence of fall. It is the gateway to winter and analogously, to the Winter of our lives.

October as a time of reflection on life is not lost on Major League Baseball. MLB's slogan for October is "I Life for This". Well, I don't. I mean, I do love baseball. I love the Red Sox. I especially love October baseball. But I don't live for 18 men playing ball for millions of dollars. Baseball is a pastime.

What do we live for? Elders, facing the scourge of aging and the loss of those dear to them, lose clear reasons to live. It is not uncommon for me, when visiting an elderly client at a nursing home, to hear weak voices telling anyone who will listen they want to die.

We live for hope. We live for tomorrow. Without that, death is a comfortable option. What's bothering me is the power of the media, America, Inc., and the organized establishment's role in shaping what they thing retirement and aging should look like for millions of Americans. They employ a cadre of image and word specialists to create viewers, customers and members of organizations.

Take AARP, which after an odd name change, no longer stands for anything - It's just AARP (rhymes with carp, except in Boston where it rhymes with no work in our vocabulary). It is an organization solely committed to delivering the most efficient database of Americans old enough to obtain personal credit (OK, they have some standards - you need to be of "retirement" age, which is defined as age 50).

AARP is essentially a big insurance agency, a vast department store and pharmacy with a direct mail business for every pill pusher, gadget and ointment and older American needs to make life complete. Their mission is to sell and to promote the sale of all manner of tschochkes they think older Americans need to live a good and active life.

The media likewise are entwined with pharmaceutical giants in an effort to maintain fear in the minds of the aged so they can sell them salves and potions.

My generation rarely watches the evening news. How do I know? Well, frankly, how many of us need Lipitor, Viagra, Zoloff or any other little pill? The media machine's news function is largely sponsored by Merck, Pfizer, Novartis and others pandering their trademarked brand for all that ails you.

Many older people watch the news out of fear the world is coming to an end. And it is. Just not today, or in your hometown of Suburbia, USA. I think all of this careful and manipulative branding of what it means to age in America is going to be lost wholesale to the baby boomer generation's unique perspective on things. For one, improved health and increased personal debt will keep them in the workforce for many more years. Retirement, what's that?

Technological connections and improved access to information should help boomers comparison shop for services and test the vapid claims of unscrupulous salesmen.

Last, boomers are tired of being boomers. Seriously, how many times do you need to hear you were the product of your parents' pent-up sexual energy, after years of war in foreign lands? These people were rock'n rollers, hippies, yippies, yuppies, dinks and now boomers. They have had enough of labels. I'm looking forward to watching boomers break the media-imposed aging model AARP and the pharmaceutical machine has so carefully created for them.

Welcome to Boston, AARP

The American Association for Retired People is in Boston this weekend for a national conference.

Watch your wallets.

AARP started out speaking and advocating for older Americans who were not well-represented in Washington. Success brought more and more older Americans into the fold. AARP soon realized there was gold in the mailing list of elders looking for a voice in a sea of special interest lobbyists, corporate welfare and multi-national hand-outs.

At first, the mailings were but a trickle of approved companies soliciting the business of older Americans. AARP members gave these first mailings careful consideration because they came from a respected organization. But AARP's lure and the lust for the buck grew along with the mailing list.

The trickle became a rampaging flood as the mailboxes of elders strained to keep up with the assembly-line parade of ads for nearly anything that could be sold. Liver spot bleach, incontinence pads, denture glue - you name it and AARP will pitch it to its members for a piece of the action.

The age for membership in this association of retired people dropped to 50. How many 50-year old folks retire these days? Not many, but boy did that age drop plump up the mailing list and the coffers!

AARP's big weekend event - the Boston conference? The Life@50+ National Event & Expo is nothing more than a huge trade show - more chances to sell something, anything to the droves of people flocking to the show. Representation and service of elders is the banner AARP always waves, but it seems to this cynical eye the real purpose these days is to feed and grow the marketing machine.

Yes, the trade show will present even more opportunities to sign up even more elders for non-stop health insurance salesman, sellers of chair lifts and call-alert systems for when you've fallen and can't reach your wallet.

Congress might soon have to pass a DO NOT SOLICIT THE DEAD Bill, to protect surviving family members from the deluge of direct mail that will try to follow elders into eternity in the hope of one last sale.